Labyrinth BlogLabyrinth Blog Conversations

Here are our latest Blog conversations - there's useful stuff here, so check them out. Remember, we welcome participation! So choose, subscribe and comment on a conversation that interests you.

As a marketing strategy, is promoting family ownership a viable option?

As a marketing strategy, is promoting family ownership a viable option?

Author -  Allan Kent [Guest]

A lot of NZ companies promote that they are family owned as a key part of their marketing strategy. Does this help or hinder them?

I was recently working with a client on the strategy side of their website project and during the scoping session this subject came up. In this case the company manufactures natural health care supplements and some food products, and I wasn't sure whether this angle was the right one for it to take, especially as it intends to significantly expand its overseas sales operation.

Let me explain my reasoning:

I accept that a family ownership structure is often perceived by the public as a company that cares, that has values beyond mere profits, is concerned with its reputation and is therefore responsible in all that it does etc.  

However, it’s possible that in this particular case a negative angle also presents itself: 

  • The company might not have the ‘best’ people in key positions. Their products require a high degree of scientific knowledge and expertise. Might some of the key positions have been filled by virtue of a family name rather than on qualifications and experience? 
  • Although many companies do start off as family concerns, generally once they get to a certain size they revert to more open ownership for one reason or another. A company that is still family run therefore suggests that it is smaller in scale. Might this impact on its ability to meet client demands and handle financial setbacks as well as research and development limitations?

Now don’t jump down my throat at this point – these were merely my initial reservations with this marketing angle. 

To get a wider range of opinions on this topic, I posed the question to a LinkedIn forum, and the question generated a huge amount of interest! 

Some believed very strongly in promoting the family angle believing that the positives easily outweighed any negatives. Interestingly many of these advocates were from family run companies who stated that their marketing was indeed working very well from this angle.  Having said that, none were in this particular industry, and none were very big companies!  

Others were equally strong in their feeling against the family approach citing in the main the reasons above. 

One advocate of the family company structure pointed out Porsche as being a great example of a family run company. Now I don’t remember this angle ever being promoted, and personally I don’t think I’d buy a Porsche because of its ownership structure, would you? But the example did highlight one thing – Porsche became a great car company because of the passion it had for its products, in terms of design and engineering excellence. This passion is often found in family companies, and it’s this passion which leads to these companies providing great products and services. In a nutshell, it comes down to the basic concept of features and benefits. The ownership structure is a feature – the benefits are the passion elements described above, and it’s these that need to be promoted, not the ownership structure itself.

The forums qualified another thing for me too - the industry the company operates in is important too. Some businesses actually do lend themselves to the family ownership angle. For example if you are a family bakers making cup cakes – promoting the family recipe is a great approach, and implications of smallness simply adds to the unique appeal. On the other hand trying to apply this approach to a business where people imagine people in white coats and hats and production lines of pills and test tubes – much harder to associate that positive family spin to it.

This topic has been an intriguing one for myself and my client, but is certainly not one with definitive answers.

Post New Comment

Related Articles

Improving User Experience Through Animation Effects

Improving User Experience Through Animation Effects

Date: Wednesday, 7 August 2013

Find out how website animation can be an engaging experience for your users! Engaging your users keeps them in your website for longer and they become more receptive to your key messages. ...

Will a professional website designer add value to your site?

Will a professional website designer add value to your site?

Date: Wednesday, 5 October 2011

With so many template and DIY options out there, why would you consider paying for a professional website design and build when you can do it yourself so much cheaper? This article explains why ...

Are you sure your print designer can design your website?

Date: Wednesday, 17 August 2011

There is no doubt about it - your print designer has a great talent for handling your print design requirements, but will these skills lead to a website that works as well as it should do? ...

Latest Conversations...

Blog Pro RSS

Omni-Channel marketing key to superior customer experience

Date: 3:43 p.m. Wednesday, 28 January 2015

Author: Vaughan Reed

Hospitality Industry cannot afford to ignore omni-channel opportunity

Date: 10:20 a.m. Tuesday, 9 December 2014

Author: Vaughan Reed

WordPress, Joomla and Drupal are NOT the Best CMS

Date: 1:48 p.m. Monday, 11 August 2014

Author: Mike Johnston from CMS Critic

Important Changes .NZ Domain Name

Date: 1:49 p.m. Thursday, 24 July 2014

Author: Vaughan Reed

Scenic Hotel Group - Integration of Kiosk Technology

Date: 10:21 a.m. Wednesday, 18 June 2014

Author: Labyrinth Solutions

Let one of our Web Strategists help you achieve online success...
Enter the code shown *
 
Stay Connected
 
Our Service
Client Partnerships
Contegro Resources
© 2012 Labyrinth Solutions Ltd  |  www.website.co.nz  |  New Zealand Website Design and Development  |  Content Management by Contegro